OGM MARCOQUEST NOT WORKING

A forum for the general posts relating to MacroQuest. *DEPRECATED: This forum is no longer in public use, but remains here for your reading pleasure. Enjoy

Moderator: MacroQuest Developers

sauxer
orc pawn
orc pawn
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:01 am

Post by sauxer » Tue Apr 12, 2005 6:05 pm

eqsolro wrote:Hello,

we are the Dev Team from Zony - pls can you work little bit faster?
All our tools are MQ2 based - and we cant get em to run by ourself..

Help us please, our GM´s are dying, and running thru walls like newbs.

best reg.


:)

rofl


I'm glad Lax started the post this time, I was almost tempted but was afraid my username might get banned before he read it and saw it was a joke. Long live MQ!

Lax
We're not worthy!
We're not worthy!
Posts: 3524
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 1:01 pm
Location: ISBoxer
Contact:

Post by Lax » Tue Apr 12, 2005 6:38 pm

Yeormom wrote:I think the leveling rate in WoW was too fast actually~ with little high end content, they should have made it worse, imo.
Well, taking into account that they would not have planned for their servers to overflow in the first month and having to divert resources from providing early high end content to providing early servers and bug fixes... I would say that they went about things the right way, but in hindsight (which is 20/20), they should have gotten some high level content in quicker, and prepared for a huge boom in players 24x the rate of other MMOs in north america ;)

I do honestly think theyre doing a good job considering the situation. The next MMO to come out (Vanguard?) will surely take notice and have a "plan B" ready, and will probably have more high level content immediately just in case they have to divert resources. I believe it is common practice to implement a small amount of high level content for release, and then add plenty as soon as possible afterward while people are still levelling -- and even if it isn't common practice, it's certainly what I would expect to do if I was producing a major MMORPG competing for release with another major MMORPG.
Lax Lacks
Master of MQ2 Disaster
Purveyor of premium, EULA-safe MMORPG Multiboxing Software
* Multiboxing with ISBoxer: Quick Start Video
* EQPlayNice, WinEQ 2.0

DigitalMocking
a grimling bloodguard
a grimling bloodguard
Posts: 620
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 5:53 pm

Post by DigitalMocking » Tue Apr 12, 2005 7:03 pm

Lax wrote:
DigitalMocking wrote:
Frank25 wrote:It is kinda sad that on patchdays i go play wow, and as soon as MQ is fixed. i run back and play eq :P
Its only sad that you're playing WoW at all. Look at it this way, in the few hours you're playing WoW, you probably gained 6 levels.
Nah what's sad is spending 8 hours to get 1/5 of a level in EQ (levels 51-59, back in the day). Or getting 9+ AA's in less than an hour. What's wrong with the levelling rate in WoW? :roll: Just because it's different doesnt mean it sucks.
The problem I had with WoW was how easy it was. Within 3 months of launch I had 4 toons at 60. I think WoW is a fantastic game for the more casual/fun player.

I think the PVP system being open like it does destroys a lot of the fun for the casual player because of the Diablo II dewds who hit 60, and get bored, so they run around level 20+ noob areas and gank.

Having absolutely nothing to do in "endgame" and blizzard's track record for slow patching/adding content or expansions to games finally got me to cancel my accounts.

Overall I loved the game, I wish blizzard had another 6 months to work on it before it was released and had time to add more options for classes/races/skill trees.

Yeormom
orc pawn
orc pawn
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 3:09 pm

Post by Yeormom » Tue Apr 12, 2005 7:16 pm

I'd have to agree they launched a very sturdy game blending so many different previous MMO's into a new one and not being repetitive. However, Blizzard did not/has not attempted to adjust their budget for the crowd they ended up with. They have taken the cheaper road minimizing network and development costs in relation to what funds they originally expected. I enjoyed the game but the content is lacking with no signs of improvement in the near future...just rumors of a PvP zone that would quickly become tiresome. All in all, WoW is a perfect game for a beginning MMOer. I can't think of a single MMO that is easier to catch onto. I will be awaiting the next challenge.
~Yeormom for teh win!!!!!!111one

hairpin
I like boobies
Posts: 108
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 1:01 pm

Post by hairpin » Tue Apr 12, 2005 7:16 pm

MARCO QUEST
POLO QUEST
[url=http://www.speedtest.net][img]http://www.speedtest.net/result/136815272.png[/img][/url]

wiesshund
orc pawn
orc pawn
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 4:29 pm

Post by wiesshund » Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:05 pm

Ok im having big troubles here compiling MARCOquest.

when i got to batch build it spews out errors like this

d:\vctoolkit\MQ2\MARCOMain\RTFM-ASS.h(31) : fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'retard.h': No such file or directory
MARCOpolo.cpp
d:\vctoolkit\MQ2\MARCOMain\POLOwarp.h(31) : fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'fugginjerk.h': No such file or directory
MARCOStupid.cpp

Build log was saved at "file://d:\vctoolkit\MARCO\MARCOMain\Intermediate\Fuckingdumbass.htm"
MARCOMain - 24 error(s), 0 warning(s)


what am i doing wrong?

Yeormom
orc pawn
orc pawn
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 3:09 pm

Post by Yeormom » Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:15 pm

You need to compile the MQ2Main.cpp with JREE 1.5 kay?
~Yeormom for teh win!!!!!!111one

User avatar
Night Hawk
a grimling bloodguard
a grimling bloodguard
Posts: 590
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 4:56 pm

Post by Night Hawk » Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:25 pm

Or getting 9+ AA's in less than an hour
:shock: Where you campin? :wink:

Yeormom
orc pawn
orc pawn
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 3:09 pm

Post by Yeormom » Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:28 pm

cshome~ good xp in the basement arena.
~Yeormom for teh win!!!!!!111one

User avatar
gimp
a grimling bloodguard
a grimling bloodguard
Posts: 584
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 9:28 am
Location: internet

Post by gimp » Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:36 pm

sauxer wrote: rofl
who is rolf?

BertoxBoy
a lesser mummy
a lesser mummy
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 12:11 am

Post by BertoxBoy » Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:09 pm

DigitalMocking wrote:
Lax wrote:
DigitalMocking wrote: Its only sad that you're playing WoW at all. Look at it this way, in the few hours you're playing WoW, you probably gained 6 levels.
Nah what's sad is spending 8 hours to get 1/5 of a level in EQ (levels 51-59, back in the day). Or getting 9+ AA's in less than an hour. What's wrong with the levelling rate in WoW? :roll: Just because it's different doesnt mean it sucks.
The problem I had with WoW was how easy it was. Within 3 months of launch I had 4 toons at 60. I think WoW is a fantastic game for the more casual/fun player.

I think the PVP system being open like it does destroys a lot of the fun for the casual player because of the Diablo II dewds who hit 60, and get bored, so they run around level 20+ noob areas and gank.

Having absolutely nothing to do in "endgame" and blizzard's track record for slow patching/adding content or expansions to games finally got me to cancel my accounts.

Overall I loved the game, I wish blizzard had another 6 months to work on it before it was released and had time to add more options for classes/races/skill trees.
nothing, just wanted to nest in 4 quotes...
EQ

User avatar
TheUnholy
a hill giant
a hill giant
Posts: 269
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 11:59 pm

Post by TheUnholy » Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:34 pm

BertoxBoy wrote:
DigitalMocking wrote:
Lax wrote: Nah what's sad is spending 8 hours to get 1/5 of a level in EQ (levels 51-59, back in the day). Or getting 9+ AA's in less than an hour. What's wrong with the levelling rate in WoW? :roll: Just because it's different doesnt mean it sucks.
The problem I had with WoW was how easy it was. Within 3 months of launch I had 4 toons at 60. I think WoW is a fantastic game for the more casual/fun player.

I think the PVP system being open like it does destroys a lot of the fun for the casual player because of the Diablo II dewds who hit 60, and get bored, so they run around level 20+ noob areas and gank.

Having absolutely nothing to do in "endgame" and blizzard's track record for slow patching/adding content or expansions to games finally got me to cancel my accounts.

Overall I loved the game, I wish blizzard had another 6 months to work on it before it was released and had time to add more options for classes/races/skill trees.
nothing, just wanted to nest in 4 quotes...
ok

Yeormom
orc pawn
orc pawn
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 3:09 pm

Post by Yeormom » Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:38 pm

TheUnholy wrote:
BertoxBoy wrote:
DigitalMocking wrote: The problem I had with WoW was how easy it was. Within 3 months of launch I had 4 toons at 60. I think WoW is a fantastic game for the more casual/fun player.

I think the PVP system being open like it does destroys a lot of the fun for the casual player because of the Diablo II dewds who hit 60, and get bored, so they run around level 20+ noob areas and gank.

Having absolutely nothing to do in "endgame" and blizzard's track record for slow patching/adding content or expansions to games finally got me to cancel my accounts.

Overall I loved the game, I wish blizzard had another 6 months to work on it before it was released and had time to add more options for classes/races/skill trees.
nothing, just wanted to nest in 4 quotes...
ok
You guys shouldn't do this. It makes a bunch of spam...
~Yeormom for teh win!!!!!!111one

BertoxBoy
a lesser mummy
a lesser mummy
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 12:11 am

Post by BertoxBoy » Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:43 pm

Yeormom wrote:
TheUnholy wrote:
BertoxBoy wrote: nothing, just wanted to nest in 4 quotes...
ok
You guys shouldn't do this. It makes a bunch of spam...
we know, thanks for sharing that peice of info
EQ

par
decaying skeleton
decaying skeleton
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 3:05 am

Post by par » Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:53 pm

man is this thing fixed?